Banner Image

Legal News

Marks & Spencer Claims Planning Victory at High Court

A High Court challenge brought by Marks & Spencer (M&S) has resulted in victory for the retailer.

M&S contested a decision by the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to turn down planning permission for the construction of a new nine-storey mixed office and retail store at the western end of Oxford Street, London. Planning for the construction project, which would involve demolishing and redeveloping the retailer's current store on the site, was refused by the Secretary of State despite having been approved by a government planning inspector.

After M&S launched legal proceedings, however, the Court found that, in making his decision, the Secretary of State had misinterpreted the National Planning Policy Framework and therefore erred in law. The Secretary of State had also failed to explain why he felt that refusal of planning permission would only cause 'limited' harm to London's West End, contrary to the opinion of the planning inspector. Having dismissed the various grounds for the refusal, the Court overturned the Secretary of State's decision.

The judgment was acknowledged by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, which is now considering its next steps.

For more information or to speak to one of our experts, please call us on 01606 48777

Get in touch

  • "Extremely fair, understanding, caring and knowledgeable in all aspects of family law."

    Mr P
  • "Amazing attitude and caring towards its customers in life's most stressful situations."

    Anonymous
  • "Highly recommend the conveyancing services. Extremely satisfied with the overall level of service provided - kept me informed at every stage, providing good information and advice."

    Heather Woolley
  • "Excellent efficient will-writing service from very friendly staff. Everything explained to us so that we understood it. Fantastic!"

    Jane Imisson
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.